biblatex: A team to continue the work

I posted a while ago about biblatex, looking for news of the author, Philipp Lehman. He’d been very active in replying to bug reports up to about 5 months ago, since when no-one has heard from him. As I said before, that’s a big concern well beyond LaTeX work, but it’s also left a question over continued development of biblatex.

Philipp Lehman had discussed a number of plans with the lead developer of Biber, Philip Kime. Unsurprisingly, Philip Kime has been keen to make sure that development of biblatex continues, but he wanted some help with the styles and any ‘hard-core’ TeX stuff. So a small team of ‘biblatex maintainers’ has been set up:

We’ve got two separate tasks. First, we want to deal with issues with the current release of biblatex (v1.7). These are tracked on the SourceForge site, and there are a few outstanding which are being looked at. Second, we want to continue the work that Philipp Lehman had planned. That work is taking place on GitHub, and there are some big issues to tackle.

Perhaps the biggest single item on the horizon for biblatex 2.0 is dropping BibTeX support, and going Biber-only. That’s something that Philipp Lehman has been planning for some time: the reality is that supporting BibTeX is increasingly awkward, and it’s making adding new features increasingly complex (and bug-prone). Of course, dropping BibTeX support will be a significant change, but it’s been on the horizon for some time, and will open the way to further extending the data model biblatex (and Biber) user.

Of course, if Philipp Lehman does return (and we hope he does), then the ‘team’ will be very happy to hand back to him. For the moment, sticking with the roadmap seems the best way forward.

9 thoughts on “biblatex: A team to continue the work

  1. A sigh of relief! I work with dead languages, but biblatex and XeTeX have together pushed me together into the LaTeX land, never to look back at MS Office or other office software. So it has creeped me out when there is a possibility of losing Phillip Lehmann for good. But, as always with open source projects, there are some good people who will continue to carry the torch. Thanks a lot!

  2. I’ve a bibtex localization to catalan. Which is now the appropiate method to send it? Should I deliver it to the SF contrib tracker? Maybe it is better to send a pull request to github project?

  3. Do you think to implement the “tome” field?
    For there are some volumes composed by more tomes
    and it likes me that this field is not available
    in biblatex. It woule be useful to be able
    to indicate “author, title, vol. 1, tome 3, …”
    thank you

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.