<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LuaTeX reachs 0.40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texdev.net/2009/04/23/luatex-reachs-040/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texdev.net/2009/04/23/luatex-reachs-040/</link>
	<description>Coding in the TeX world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.texdev.net/2009/04/23/luatex-reachs-040/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texdev.net/?p=276#comment-921</guid>
		<description>I did say &quot;widely discussed&quot;: this was one of the reasons (why worry about back-compatibility if other factors block it). I&#039;d agree with you that a &quot;primitive clean-up&quot; is a positive factor, and in the longer term there really should be no issue. It&#039;s only early adopters who will even know anything has changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did say &#8220;widely discussed&#8221;: this was one of the reasons (why worry about back-compatibility if other factors block it). I&#8217;d agree with you that a &#8220;primitive clean-up&#8221; is a positive factor, and in the longer term there really should be no issue. It&#8217;s only early adopters who will even know anything has changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://www.texdev.net/2009/04/23/luatex-reachs-040/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texdev.net/?p=276#comment-920</guid>
		<description>Due to the other inherent incompatibilities (not related to primitives) that Taco listed in a subsequent message, it seems luatex will never replace pdftex, unfortunately. Of course the primitive clean-up is still a very good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to the other inherent incompatibilities (not related to primitives) that Taco listed in a subsequent message, it seems luatex will never replace pdftex, unfortunately. Of course the primitive clean-up is still a very good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

